Saturday, December 28, 2024

7 Quick Takes Friday

 


--1-- 


Just in case you weren't on my Christmas card list. I want to wish everyone a Merry Christmas. Wait, you say. Its December 27th.  Christmas is over.  Wrong. Liturgically, Christmas starts on with the Vigil Mass  on Christmas Eve and goes until the Sunday after Epiphany or after January 6th, the Feast of the Baptism of the Lord. 

--2--


Also, let me be one of many to wish you the blessings of a Happy New Year! A new year gives us new opportunities to change our lives.  To make things better. While dining out with some friends a couple of days before Christmas, we all made some New Years Resolutions. I have been overweight most of my adult life. Now I've started watching what I eat. Portion control is important.  Counting calories.  Wiser,   healthier choices.  That along with riding my exercise bike and I lost 20 pounds in 2024. The hardest part has been keeping that going.  I'd like to ride three or four days a week to start.  One of my goals is to lose 35 pounds in 2025. Another goal is to declutter my house.  It's amazing how much stuff that we accumulate in our lifetime. A couple of years ago I had new siding put on my house.  Two years ago,  I had my bathroom remodeled.  This past year, it was my kitchen.  Once I get the house decluttered, I'll be able to redecorate the inside. New carpeting, painting,  and new furniture. My final goal is to improve my spiritual life. This past year I went back to school. I've also been teaching PSR at my Catholic. See my previous post.

https://terrysbits.blogspot.com/2024/12/im-going-gack-to-school.html.

I can think of no better way to improve my spiritual life but to attend daily Mass or pray the rosary.

--3-- 


For those who are sports fans, how about the KC Chiefs? Is anyone amazed at how week in and week out they continue to find ways to win. While at times, it seems that Patrick Mahomes and his offense has not been as efficient,  the defense has been much improved.  How can one bet against them to win a third straight Super Bowl. 

--4-- 


Also, from the sports world, who doesn't like the expanded NCAA football playoffs? What took them so long?  Finally there won't be any excuses. Instead of arguing about who the team that was left out  that should have been in, we can sit back and watch the teams play it out on the field. Now if my Ohio State Buckeye can bounce back from a two loss season and win a national championship. 

--5-- 


Who isn't happy that Donald Trump will be back in the White House?  Biden and Harris were so out of touch with what wss going on in America.  The Biden economy for starters. You don't spend your way out of debt.  Biden Inflation Reduction Act actually raised Inflation. But Biden didn't have an answer.  Americans spent more money on groceries. His policies on day one slowed down oil production and raised oil prices. His answer was to spend more money. You would never do that in your personal household budget. 

--6-- 


Moving to the fiasco at the border.  Has anyone noticed the illegal immigrants committing crime?  How are we supposed to support them?  They need housing, food,  health care, etc. Where is that money supposed to come from? And what about  the 300,000 children that the Biden administration has lost track of.  I wonder how many those children have been sold into slavery.  And then there were 250K fentanyl deaths under Biden as a result of illegal drugs crossing the border.  Finally, don't be surprised if this country has another 9-11 type of terrorist attack  because the failure to vet those who came into the country. 

--7--


Finally,  who isn't upset with the moral decline in this country.
The moral state of America is in deep trouble. That’s not an opinion—it’s what the American people believe. In March of 2022, a Marist poll, conducted for Deseret News titled, “Faith in America,” found that 72 percent of Americans think the nation’s moral compass is pointed in the wrong direction.

In June of that year, a Gallup poll revealed that a record-high 50 percent of Americans rated the overall state of moral values as “poor,” and another 37 percent said it was “only fair.” The public is also pessimistic about the future: 78 percent say morals are getting worse.

Why is this? Six issues garnered a double-digit response. “Consideration of others” topped the list, followed by “racism/discrimination,” “lack of faith or religion,” “lack of morals,” “sense of entitlement,” and “lack of family structure.”

Some of the issues that I'm concerned with are abortion and the transgender movement. How is it ever okay to kill an innocent baby? And do you really think children should be transitioning? How healthy can this really be?  Is is fair for biological boys to compete with girls in sports? 

Sunday, December 22, 2024

I'm Going Gack to School

Here's something that you might  find interesting. I'm going back to College to get  a Masters degree in Theology. So why would a sixty-six year old retired dude want to do something like that? Shouldn't I be kicking back, taking it easy?

I am a cradle Catholic. I first became interested in Theology many years ago, at a family Thanksgiving dinner, my older brother announced that he was agnostic. He eventually left the Catholic Church and now identifies as an atheist.  I didn't have any answers to my brother's objections, but promised myself that I would attempt to find answers.  A lot of his beliefs came from Bart Ehrman. He would also read: Sam Harris,  Raymond Brown,  Hans Küng and others.  In my mission to find answers,  I would  listen to and watch EWTN radio and TV. I would read The National Catholic Register. Father Corapi and Catholic Answers Live were some of my early sources for information.
I began attending the Midwest Catholic Family Conference and reading books by  Steve Ray,  Tim Staples,  Dr. Scott Hahn, Trent Horn, Peter Kreeft, David B Currie, Carl E. Olson, Marcus Grodi, CS Lewis, and Dr. Brant Pitre. I've watched videos and listened to talks by Fr. Chris Alar, Fr. Michael Schmitz, Dr. Edward Feser, Fr. Spitzer. Fr. John Riccardo, William Lane Craig, Dr. Craig Blomberg, Gary Habermas, Mike Licona,  Gregory A Boyd, and Lee Strobel. I always wanted to learn more

When I retired almost three years ago  I made a commitment to teach PSR at my parish. For those of you who aren't Catholic or don't know, PSR stands for Parish School of Religion.  It's what used to be called CCD  (Confraternity of Christian Doctrine) when I was growing up. The definition of confraternity is a brotherhood. We had our CCD on Sunday mornings between the 9 and 11 O'clock Masses. It's for kids who don't have a Catholic school  or for kids who go to public school. PSR is how these kids learn their Catechism. At my parish we have classes on Wednesday nights from 6:30 - 7:30pm. Classes started after Labor Day and go until May.   I teach 5th Grade.  We teach them about the Sacraments.

I made this commitment because over the years,  it has hurt me to see too many Catholics who don't know their faith.  They don't know how to explain what the Catholic Church teaches.  Why do we believe what we believe?  I had two choices.  I could sit back and complain about it,  or I could get up and do something about it. I love learning about my faith.  I love sharing my faith. I love Jesus Christ! I love the Catholic Church.  I believe it to be the OneTrue Church that Jesus Christ started.  Jesus Christ is my ticket to heaven. The Catholic Church is my vehicle to get there.

Going back to school and studying Theology is a great way to learn about my faith.  I can't think of a better way to: 1) Come up with answers for my atheist brother,  2) become a better Catechist and PSR  teacher, and  3) learn how to improve my spiritual life and share it with others.  The best part is that I am receiving a tuition free scholarship  to get a masters degree at Newman University. 

So back in August,  I  spotted the following advertisement on the Facebook page of a friend who worked in the Admissions department at Newman University here in Wichita.


One of the requirements was to be a Catechist, a PSR teacher or OCIA  teacher in the Wichita Diocese.  Check.  I would meet that requirement. The Facebook post that led me to this program/scholarship  said "any bachelor's degree". My degree was in Business Administration and Economics.  My GPA  was 3.094. Check. It looked like I would qualify for this scholarship.

Excited and interested,  I went to the  Newman  University website to check it out and it said... "Bachelor’s degree in theology or related field, such as philosophy or history from an accredited college or university with a GPA of 3.0 or higher."  That confused me because her Facebook post said "any degree." I pointed that out to her and she put me in touch with the Dean of Catholic Studies. He told me that was a misprint on the website  and they would take any BA degree. I was definitely interested  but after talking to the  Dean,  I found out that their quota was full for the fall  semester but they put me on a list and I would get in on the next opening if someone drops out,  or possibly in the summer or fall semester next year.  

Well, I couple of weeks later,  he called me back and told me that an opening had come up and I could get in mid semester.  I would have to move quickly. I needed to go online and register,  get my  transcript  sent from my previous school to Newman, write an essay telling them why I was interested in the program, get a letter of recommendation from my pastor,  and go online and enroll. Got all of that done, hope I didn't forget anything.  Then  I got an email officially welcoming me to the program and I started on October 13th and still needed to get my textbooks


I am in the MTS program,  It's not as intense as the MA program. The program is 30 credit hours. That's 10 classes.  Watch the short  6 minute video below which explains how it works. Students take  one class at a time.  Each class lasts 8 weeks. In all including summer semester,  it's a little over 2 years. Most is online  and there are textbooks required for each class.  Each week, there are two video modules, assigned reading,  and discussion in study groups on the course website. Three weeks into the program  students come to campus for an intensive weekend. We also had to do a six to eight page research  paper. 

https://youtu.be/PoxyuxsTjUg?suCPe4b-q3E3QnUNt

The Master in Theological Studies degree (M.T.S.) is intended to deepen the theological understanding of diocesan catechists and teachers of religion. It prepares students to explore and explain the Catholic theological tradition and provides a solid grounding in that tradition. The program is intended for those working in catechetical ministry in a Roman Catholic context and anticipates questions that frequently arise in the classroom and during the RCIA process. The MTS program prepares students to teach in Catholic high schools, apply to hospital chaplaincy programs, or work in parishes or diocesan offices. It also prepares lay people to teach classes in Parish Schools of Religion (PSR), teach or direct the Rite of Christian Initiation of Adults (RCIA) and participate in other parochial ministries.

The Department of theology offers two degrees in its graduate program of theology. The Master in Theological Studies (MTS) provides a solid grounding in the Catholic theological tradition and is intended for those working in parish ministry in a Roman Catholic context. 

The Master of Arts (MA) in Theology  has more rigorous requirements and is intended to prepare students to teach theology in a classroom setting as well as preparing those interested in pursuing doctoral work in theology. The MA degree requires some different course work than the MTS degree; it also requires the completion of a thesis and a comprehensive examination, as well as foreign language requirements, none of which are required for the MTS.

The tuition free scholarship is made possible through the Catholic Diocese of Wichita... The St. Maria de Mattias Endowment is a fund of the Catholic Diocese of Wichita which is intended to support innovative catechetical programs in order to help strengthen religious education in the Wichita and Dodge City Catholic Dioceses.

Through the support of the St. Maria de Mattias Endowment and the through the generosity of the Most Reverend Carl Kemme, Bishop of Wichita, a limited number of full-tuition scholarships are available to qualified catechists of the Wichita and Dodge City dioceses. To qualify for a full-tuition scholarship, students must be active in the catechetical ministry within the Diocese of Wichita or Dodge City at the parish level and must also have the approval of their pastor. DRE’s; RCIA catechists; Youth Catechists; Adult Education Catechists and any other catechetical ministry at the parish level supported by the local pastor qualify a student to receive a full-tuition scholarship from the St. Maria de Mattias Endowment.

https://newmanu.edu/academics/graduate-programs/theology/scholarships

Thanks to Newman University, Bishop Kenme, and the Diocese of Wichita for making this opportunity possible. 

And so I've completed my first class, a study on saints Athanasius, Augustine,  and Aquinas.  My first thought is to admit a preconceived notion that I always had, that Catholic Doctrine was "set in stone." That's one thing that I  always liked about the Catholic Church.  You could read the Bible and even some of the early Church Fathers and see something similar to what we have today. Boy was I wrong.  I had skipped over these three outstanding theological minds. While today, I will admit that Catholic Doctrine is not "set in stone, it does  have a strong foundation and is very stable on its its established teachings.

The Church has adapted and evolved over time. That's where the A-Team, as Professor Papsdorf calls them come in. It is exciting to see how they were all responding to issues of their time, addressing new societal issues or interpretations of scripture. But in the end it all fits together like, solving a jigsaw puzzle.  How exciting it was to see how things developed historically and how we got from point A to point B. I think what we can learn today is that teachings can and do change, although today,  probably more cosmetic changes. I don't think we're going to see any new major doctrinal changes. Hopefully we shouldn't get too troubled when things like the recent Church Synod take place, because in the end, I think that the Holy Spirit is watching over us. Just in case, I hope that we will always have some strong minds similar to the A-Team who are ready to step in and defend the faith should modern day heritics come forward.  And didn't Jesus give us a guarantee that the Church would not be overcome with evil?

Matthew 16:18 And so I say to you, you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church,* and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it.

What I liked most is that all of their teachings gave me a handbook, setting goals, kind of like a road map, on how to achieve perfection and get to the end. But too often we get off the road. We have temptations in our journey. Fr Aaron at Mass a couple of weeks ago, gave us a golf analogy. He tells the story of his uncles going golfing. ⛳ Occasionally they would take their grandmother with them.  One time she made the comment that she couldn’t understand.  The flag is over there, but you hit the ball that direction, and you hit it the other direction.  Why don't you hit it towards the flag? He says that's the last time grandma went with them.  But isn't that the way our journey is? Even though we know what the ultimate goal is, we make choices that take us off course. 

What I like about the readings  form  the A-Team is that they also showed us how to fight temptations that we will encounter in our daily journeys. They gave us a road map. Some of my favorite readings were Life of Antony,  Augustine against the Pelagians, City of God,  the Summa Theologica,  especially St Thomas Aquinas Five Ways, and the chapters on Vices and Virtues. And the Sacraments which I will definitely take advantage of in my 5th Grade PSR class.  I also enjoyed figuring out Faith and Reason. Wow! So much there. While eight weeks is just enough to wet the appetite,  hopefully,  someday I'll have time to sit down and really soak all of this in.

The spring  semester starts on January 19th.  The two classes that I will be taking ar "New Testament Theology" and "The Four-Fold Gospel".

Sunday, September 29, 2024

Is Trump Still Pro-Life?

 Donald Trump,  in his first term, was one of the most Pro-life  Presidents in U.S  history. 


But is he still pro-life? 

I am Catholic.  I am pro-life! From the moment of conception I  believe that what is in the womb is a human being.  It is never okay to kill any human being no matter what their stage of life.  I would like to see a law where abortion would never be allowed.  But that's not what most Americans believe.  The country is divided. 

In the latest Knights of Columbus Marist Poll, 58`percent of the respondents were pro choice and 40 percent were pro-life. Nine percent of Americans agree with me that abortion should never be allowed. Twenty-nine percent are at the other extreme that abortion should be available to a woman anytime she wants one during her entire pregnancy.  Most Americans fall somewhere in the middle.  They want abortions  but with restrictions such as allowing them  only during the first six months, allowing them only  during the first three months,  allowing them only in cases of rape or incest,  or allowing them only to save the life of the mother. 

Past history has shown that Trump is pro-life. He even takes credit for appointing Supreme Court Justice who overturned Roe v. Wade, saying that he was “proudly the person responsible for the ending” of the constitutional right to an abortion.
But this year he and the Republican Party are taking a more moderate approach. Trump, who has advocated for a national 15 week abortion ban has now backed down from that position instead suggesting that we leave it up to the states and the will of the people. 

That's because taking an approach that is too extreme possibly hurts conservatives and pro-lifers at the ballot box where pro-lifers are losing. It would be political suicide.

They’ve been defeated in every state referendum so far, and Republicans fear a backlash in support of abortion rights will hurt GOP candidates, too, possibly costing the party the presidential contest. We know that all too well here in Kansas. We lost the Value Them Both  amendment  and had a pro-abortion government re-elected in 2022.

After Republicans' disappointing performance in the 2022 midterm elections, Trump complained that his party's candidates had "lost large numbers of Voters" because they "poorly handled" the "abortion issue," especially when they "firmly insisted on No Exceptions." Republican politicians who share Trump's concern were relieved when he helped neutralize this electoral liability by accepting a wide range of state policies.

Trump urged the GOP lawmakers not to run away from the abortion debate, a posture that he said cost Republicans as many as 40 seats in the midterm elections, one source in the room told CNN.
“Republicans are so afraid of the issue,” Trump said, according to the source.
He emphasized the importance of supporting exceptions for rape, incest and the health of the mother – a call to neutralize Democratic attacks that have framed his party as “extreme” on reproductive rights

Pro-lifers have been critical of Trump.  Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, was "deeply disappointed" by Trump's position, while Live Action founder Lila Rose flatly declared that "President Trump is not a pro-life candidate."

Even if Trump moved only to rescind President Joe Biden’s wave of executive actions on abortion access and reimplement his own first-term actions, the effect would likely be far greater in the absence of federal protections for the procedure.

Among Trump allies, there’s no expectation he’d follow a different path from the one trod during his first four years.

Among the abortion actions that Trump has vowed to reimplement and reenforce, is reviving the so-called Mexico City policy. The Reagan-era rule restricts foreign nongovernmental organizations that receive assistance from the US from providing abortion services or information. Under an expansion of the policy under Trump, groups were barred from providing any abortion care, even with non-US funds, lest they risk losing American support altogether.

It was one of several key anti-abortion actions the Trump administration executed on the global stage.

Biden rescinded the policy in his first days in office.

A second Trump term would also put back in place and expand restrictions on Title X grants – federal funds for public and nonprofit groups that provide family planning.

While that funding is already barred from being used to pay for abortion clinics, the Trump administration’s restrictions sharply curtailed the number of providers who utilized the program – by more than 25%, per some estimates provided by abortion rights groups. “His first term was disastrous for reproductive rights and freedoms — including devastating changes to Title X which left far too many people without access to essential sexual and reproductive health care,” Julie Lewis, the director of public policy at Planned Parenthood Votes, told CNN. “A second term would be catastrophic for freedom and liberty.”

The Trump administration also took several actions to undermine the Affordable Care Act, which provides coverage for preventative services and birth control for millions of women, and it slashed hundreds of millions of dollars from the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program at the HHS.

Resurrecting these actions in a second Trump term would almost entirely be up to the discretion of whomever he appoints to lead the relevant federal agencies.

There are some pro-lifers who still support Trump. “He’s a pro-life president,” former Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway told Fox News days after Trump released his statement on Truth Social. “I believe he’ll be a pro-life president in the future also.”

Pro-lifers upset with Trump have mistaken their situation. Since The Supreme Court struck down Roe v. Wade, the rules have changed. The landscape has changed They’re not missing an opportunity to declare a universal right to life; they’re rather in a pitched battle to stop the other side from re-establishing a universal right to abortion.

It’s a battle they’ll lose without allies like Trump. Pro-lifers need Trump. What's important is that Republicans save the nation first.  Trump  understands that. He's being realistic.
He can do them no good if he doesn't get re-elected. He can do them no good if we don't  increase our majority in the House.  He can do them no good if he doesn't take back the Senate.

That’s what Frank Pavone of Priests For Life says in this video. Lets concentrate on getting back in power first. Even though our ultimate goal is to get to a point where there are no abortions. Lets save the nation first. The country is divided.  I showed you that above. Once we take back control of the country then we  let the will  of the people determine the policy on abortion

https://www.youtube.com/live/KgikKOQppp8?si=opBNRnDZhMf9_DhV

In this video Frank Pavone and  Bishop Joseph Strickland discuss the issue.  They come to the conclusion that although it's important that our end goal be no abortions we must get there incrementally.  To use a football analogy,  go for the first down, instead of the touchdown.

https://youtu.be/vD42HRqNCxI?si=kkOtsry4cfyKA56f

That makes sense to me. It took us 50 years overturn Roe v. Wade.  Is Trump pro-life?  I think so but he's also realistic.

Saturday, September 28, 2024

Why Catholics Can't Vote For A Pro-abortion Candidate

 


Why Catholics can't vote for a pro abortion candidate, and why  I still support Donald Trump.

Back in 2016 I wrote an article.

"From a Catholic Perspective: Why I support Donald Trump"

In 2020 I updated it and posted it on my blog.  You can read it here...
https://terrysbits.blogspot.com/2021/03/from-catholic-perspective-why-i-support.html

Donald Trump lost the 2020 election to Joe Biden and is running against his Vice-President Kamala Harris this year and I still support Donald Trump.  Here's why...

The issue comes up every election season.  What does the Catholic Church teach on Voting? One of my favorite priests, Fr Chris Alar with the the Marian Fathers of the Immaculate Conception answers the following questions.  Do we have a moral obligation to vote? Are there Non-negotiable Voting Issues?  What is the Preeminent Voting Issue? You can watch the video here...

https://youtu.be/gn_C8lRwY_w?si=sBxQXhDQGrlY59-R

Do we have an obligation to vote?
The answer is yes. According to the Catechism of the Catholic Church...
2240 Submission to authority and co-responsibility for the common good make it morally obligatory to pay taxes, to exercise the right to vote, and to defend one's country:

Are there Non-negotiable Voting Issues?
Yes, Pope Benedict gave us three. 

1. The Dignity of Life
Abortion
Euthanasia
Stem Cell Research

2. Sanctity of Marriage Between a Man and a Woman

3. Preservation of Religious Liberty

All other issues are considered negotiable. Issues such Immigration,  The Economy,  Racism,  Healthcare,  and the Environment are important but how a candidate stands on the Non-negotiable Issues is determines worthiness. 

Doesn't that mean that as Catholics, we're Single issue voters? Not at all. Some issues can disqualify a candidate.  For instance if a candidate was a member of the  KKK or a Neo-Natzi, but promised to fix the Economy,  Healthcare Immigration  and the Environment.  His involvement in the KKK or as a Neo-Nazi would surely disqualify that candidate.  The Non-negotiable issues are intrinsically evil.  They can never be justified.

The Church teaches that if there is a viable option for a political candidate, meaning one who supports one or more of the Non-negotiable you have a moral obligation to vote.  Personal moral  character is not important, but it is the stated commitment to public policy in keeping with the common good of the Non-negotiables which is most significant. 

What if all the candidates are unworthy? Then you must choose the one who is most supportive of the Non-negotiables. First you vote on Non-negotiables and only then, evaluate their views on the other issues such as Environment. Healthcare, Economy,  etc.
We are not voting to canonize these candidates but to give them temporary power to do the will of God. 

Formal Cooperation with evil would be:
• directly doing an abortion
• Driving someone to,an abortion clinic
• Paying for an abortion
• Murdering someone
Remote or material cooperation with evil would be shopping at a store that you find out supports  abortion/Planned Parenthood. 

Ratzinger  tells us that a Catholic would be guilty of Formal Cooperation in evil if they deliberately vote for a candidate because of the candidate's permissive stand on abortion or euthanasia.  But votes that candidate for other reasons would be considered  Remote Material Cooperation which can be permitted in the presence of proportionate reasons are not your feelings.  "I don't like the way this candidate looks." A proportionate reason cannot be found in comparing Non-negotiables with negotiables. You can't say: "Yeah,  I know that they are pro life and they defend marriage,  but they are racist, or they are hurting Healthcare or they are not worried about the economy."
You cannot put negotiable issues in proportionate reasons above Non-negotiable Issues.  It doesn't mean that those issues aren't important.  They are. But how to fix them is negotiable.  There is no time that you can allow Non-negotiables!  They are always wrong.  Only comparing two candidates regarding Non-negotiable reasons establishes a proportionate reason.

What is the Preeminent Voting Issue?
The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) tells us that abortion is the preeminent issue among the Non-negotiables.  It can never be allowed!
All of the single issues (Healthcare,  Environment,  Economy,  immigration and even racism) depend on the most fundamental human right, the right to life.

We are obligated to inform our consciences and then follow it. St Thomas Aquinas says that we have to follow our conscience or we can be condemned.  Conscience is the activity of your intellect judging actions as right or wrong.  Feelings don't matter.  Conscience is the voice of truth.  Not your feelings.  Your opinion has to be in harmony with the truth.  I can't have an opinion contrary to the truth. My opinions can't be... "Well, I'm going to vote for this guy even though the truth of the matter is  that he stands for everything that's wrong."

Conscience only works when we inform it. When we learn the moral truth.  As a Catholic,  how do you do that?  The Magisterium gives us the Catechism but tells us what the moral issues are and why they are based on scripture.

You don't have to vote for a person who is pro-life, but you may not vote for a candidate who supports abortion.  Voting for a pro abortion candidate can be a mortal sin.  Do not vote on party affiliation lines or appearances. Don't vote for someone just because they say that they are Catholic.  Don't vote on you own interests or opinions. Don't vote for those candidates who support the lesser issues but don't  support the Non-negotiables. 

We are Catholics first, Americans second,  and Democrats or Republicans third.

The abortion stance is not new. It goes back to the first century.  Letter of St. Barnabas. 
Chapter 19

"You shall not slay the child by procuring abortion; nor, again, shall you destroy it after it is born."


Deuteronomy 30:19
"I call heaven and earth today to witness against you. I have set before you life and death, the blessing and the curse. Choose life, then, that you and your descendants may live,"



At this point I will emphasize that The Catholic Church is not trying to tell us what political party to belong to or vote for. Their job is to simply help us form our consciences. As most Catholic Bishops will tell you, it is not their duty to tell you for whom to vote, but they do have an obligation to speak out on moral issues. In 2012 the Catholic bishops of Kansas said: 

“The Church has a constitutional right, like other organizations, to express its viewpoint on matters of public policy. However, the Catholic Church is not a political interest group. Rather than instructing Catholics who to vote for, the Church’s role in the political process is to illuminate the moral dimension of the various political issues, and to form the consciences of Catholics so that they can make morally informed judgments as both voters and elected officials


Now let's apply this to the upcoming election.
Let's take a look at the Candidates and see how they stack up against the Non-negotiable Issues. 

The Dignity of Life

As I said four years ago...
Joe Biden claims to be Catholic, but goes against the teachings of the church. He supports abortion. President Biden ran for President on a pro abortion platform. The record shows that he is the most pro abortion president ever. At State of the Union he invoked the name of God when he said...
"My God, what freedom else would you take away?"
Then he made a promise to restore Roe v. Wade when he said... "If you — if you, the American people, send me a Congress that supports the right to choose, I promise you I will restore Roe v. Wade as the law of the land again."    
During a recent pro abortion rally in Florida,  Biden blessed himself making the Sign of the Cross and then doubled down on his promise to make abortion the law of the land. 

Actions speak louder than words.  Here are a couple of articles about Biden's executive orders reversing Trump's pro life policy. 

https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/28/politics/biden-abortion-executive-orders/index.html

https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/28/politics/biden-abortion-executive-orders/index.html

Also, a White House briefing bragging about Biden's pro abortion policies. 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/03/07/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-continues-the-fight-for-reproductive-freedom/

HARRIS AND WALZ ARE ALSO  EXTREME ON ABORTION. 

Since I wrote this,  Biden has dropped out of the race.  Harris has disenfranchised 14 million Democrat voters, taking over as the party's nominee.  She is just as extreme as Biden.  She has promised to restore Roe v Wade even if it means eliminating the filibuster. 

https://www.npr.org/2024/09/23/nx-s1-5123955/kamala-harris-abortion-roe-v-wade-filibuster

And Harris’s selection of Gov. Tim Walz as her running mate doubles down on her extreme strategy to put abortion at the top of the ticket. The Harris-Walz ticket is the most pro-abortion in U.S. history, openly advocating for zero regulations on abortion and even denying healthcare to babies who survive abortions. 

In Minnesota, Walz removed a requirement for doctors to report cases where babies survived abortions, an act so extreme that even former Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) advised him to tone it down — advice he publicly rejected.

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/4837181-harris-walz-abortion-issue/

Check out some of her lies about abortion.


https://americafirstpolicy.com/issues/kamala-harriss-extreme-abortion-policies-hurt-women

Earlier this year she went as far as to visit a Planned Parenthood clinic.


https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2024/08/kamalas-abortion-extremism







TRUMP IS PRO-LIFE!



Meanwhile Trump was probably the most pro life  presidents ever. He was the first president to attend at the March For Life. You can see his speech  here...

https://youtu.be/3RjuADPBo-Q?si=xa9XF4F-0Ej6xLOM

Once again,  actions speak louder than words and Trump has a record to run on. Check out the list of pro life accomplishments as noted by Priests For Life. 


https://www.priestsforlife.org/elections/trump-prolife-accomplishments.aspx


This article from the National Catholic Register also does  a great job of summarizing Trump's accomplishments...

https://www.ncregister.com/news/trump-pro-life-legacy





Thursday, May 25, 2023

Whataboutism: Priest Abuse

When is the last time that you were having a heated discussion or debate with someone about Catholic teaching and were winning the debate?   Your  opponent, backed into the corner, doesn't have an answer  so they responded  by changing the subject or making a different accusation.  Usually it comes in the form of an attack against the Catholic Church  such as priest abuse.  Here's a couple of examples that I recently found on Facebook. 


"Hmmm. 450 clery abused 2000 kids in illinois..which is probably a conservative estimate.  multiply that by 50 states.  Hmm seems to me Bill you have way bigger issues to deal with."

"Youre right..Its Catholic clergy abusing little kids..and bloated old messes like Bill D ignoring that."

"Breaking News: More than 1,900 minors were abused by people in the Catholic Church in Illinois over almost seven decades, the office of the state’s attorney general said Tuesday in an investigative report"

The tactic actually has a name. "Whataboutism".

Whataboutism is defined as the technique or practice of responding to an accusation or difficult question by making a counteraccusation or raising a different issue.

But never fear.  I have done my research and have an answer for this these accusations.

In the words of  Bishop Fulton Sheen

"There are not one hundred people in the United States who hate The Catholic Church, but there are millions who hate what they wrongly perceive the Catholic Church to be."

These accusations  don't  change the fact  that Catholic Church is still the one true church started by JesusChrist.  As the Apostles answered Jesus Christ in John 6, when they didn't understand His teachings on the Eucharist and all of His followers were leaving.  “Master, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life."

Most organizations  have scandals at one time or another.  Even Jesus Christ's ministry had a scandal when Judas  sold him out.

What it comes down to is that the Catholic Church has fixed, those problems.

Many people including the mainstream  are critical of the Catholic Church. It is sad anytime a child, teenager or adult  is sexualy abused.  What they don't tell you is that most of the cases that you read about in the mainstream media are decades old. What they also don't tell you about are the great strides that the Catholic Church has done to correct the problem. They have settled many of those cases out of court.
After the Church reforms articulated in the Dallas Charter and Essential Norms (United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, 2002a, 2002b), the number of new cases in the United States averaged about a dozen per year; during the past five years, it went down to about one new case per year. The Church has gone from averaging about 660 new cases of abuse per year during the 1970s to about 1 new case per year since about 2014 (John Jay College of Criminal Justice, 2011; Steinfels, 2019; United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, 2018).

There are about 25,000 Catholic Priests  in the United States.  What they don't tell you about is all of the good priests who don't abuse children. What they don't tell you that a higher percentage of  public school teachers abuse children. Do you support public schools?  What  they don't tell you  that there are far more children sexualy abused in their homes. Why not? Maybe because the Catholic Church is an easy target. 

I just retired from my job last year and signed up to be a catechist teaching kids religion class at church.  They take it  very serious.  I had to take a  class on child abuse.  They also do a background check.

https://archokc.org/myths

Wednesday, January 11, 2023

Answering an Atheist: Postscript-Part 9 of 9

This is my last response to your blog post. 

Mike said the following:
Postscript - The billboard in the photo gives decidedly mixed messages. Presumably Christians can agree that Jesus is Lord—whatever that means. But as we have seen, the claim of  "coming soon" is decidedly suspect. Extending the incongruity, John 3:16 has nothing to do with the lordship of Jesus, nor of his return. It succinctly explains that God's great salvific act is an act of love; it is through love that God sent his Son, so that all who believe in him can be saved. It's a nice thought, even if it's unclear why "belief" is the criterion for salvation, and even if there's no evidence that it's true.

Why isn't it true? What's your proof? Only someone who doesn't believe in God would make that statement. Just because you've made the statement doesn't mean its not true. There is plenty of evidence proving that the Bible is true. You just have to know where to find it. There is only one truth. Something cannot be true and not true at the same time. Something that is true, is true whether you like it, want it, or believe it. Your personal feelings don't make it false.

I've made the argument that Jesus Christ is who He claimed be. I've made the argument that Jesus Christ is true God and true Man. I've made the argument that He is divine and human. He makes the rules. His Church makes the rules. If He says it, then its true whether you like it, want it, or believe it.

Jesus Christ says it's true! 

Matthew 10:32-33
32 “Everyone therefore who acknowledges me before others, I also will acknowledge before my Father in heaven; 33 but whoever denies me before others, I also will deny before my Father in heaven.

Salvation is more complicated than just believing in Him. That's a good start. There's a lot more.

Scripture teaches that one’s final salvation depends on the state of the soul at death. As Jesus himself tells us, “He who endures to the end will be saved” (Matt. 24:13; cf. 25:31–46). One who dies in the state of friendship with God (the state of grace) will go to heaven. The one who dies in a state of enmity and rebellion against God (the state of mortal sin) will go to hell.

This article also tells us that that we can lose our salvation. Paul confirms that.
“See then the kindness and the severity of God: severity toward those who have fallen, but God’s kindness to you, provided you continue in his kindness; otherwise you too will be cut off” (Rom. 11:22; see also Heb. 10:26–29, 2 Pet. 2:20–21).

But there's more...Salvation is a life long process, not just a one time event.
“Are you saved?” asks the Fundamentalist. The Catholic should reply: “As the Bible says, I am already saved (Rom. 8:24, Eph. 2:5–8), but I’m also being saved (1 Cor. 1:18, 2 Cor. 2:15, Phil. 2:12), and I have the hope that I will be saved (Rom. 5:9–10, 1 Cor. 3:12–15). Like the apostle Paul I am working out my salvation in fear and trembling (Phil. 2:12), with hopeful confidence in the promises of Christ (Rom. 5:2, 2 Tim. 2:11–13).”

https://www.catholic.com/tract/assurance-of-salvation

Here's the deal. Belief is just one of many criterion. That's where it starts. The Bible tells us that there are many criterion. The Bible also tells us that the opposite is also true. The opposite is to disobey the Son. That means to obey Him is part of believing.

John 3:36
36 Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life; whoever disobeys the Son will not see life, but must endure God’s wrath.
Jesus Christ confirms that.

Matthew 10:32-33.
32 “Everyone therefore who acknowledges me before others, I also will acknowledge before my Father in heaven; 33 but whoever denies me before others, I also will deny before my Father in heaven.

Steve Ray explains salvation in this video...He tells us that there are many criterion for salvation. Nobody ever said it would be easy. We have to work on it every day of our lives.

https://youtu.be/rY0MIEsvOes

Here are the criterion for salvation.

• By believing in Christ.
John 3:16
16 “For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, so that everyone who believes in him may not perish but may have eternal life.

Acts 16:31
30 Then he brought them outside and said, “Sirs, what must I do to be saved?” 31 They answered, “Believe on the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved, you and your household.” 

• By repentance.
Acts 2:38
The First Converts
37 Now when they heard this, they were cut to the heart and said to Peter and to the other apostles, “Brothers,[i] what should we do?” 38 Peter said to them, “Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ so that your sins may be forgiven; and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.

2 Peter 3:9
8 But do not ignore this one fact, beloved, that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. 9 The Lord is not slow about his promise as some count slowness, but is forbearing toward you,[a] not wishing that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance. 

• By Baptism.
John 3:5
 5 Jesus answered, “Very truly, I tell you, no one can enter the kingdom of God without being born of water and Spirit.
1 Peter 3:21
18 For Christ also died[b] for sins once for all, the righteous for the unrighteous, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh but made alive in the spirit; 19 in which he went and preached to the spirits in prison, 20 who formerly did not obey, when God’s patience waited in the days of Noah, during the building of the ark, in which a few, that is, eight persons, were saved through water. 21 Baptism, which corresponds to this, now saves you, not as a removal of dirt from the body but as an appeal to God for a clear conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ, 22 who has gone into heaven and is at the right hand of God, with angels, authorities, and powers subject to him.

Titus 3:5
4 But when the goodness and loving kindness of God our Savior appeared, 5 he saved us, not because of any works of righteousness that we had done, but according to his mercy, through the water[a] of rebirth and renewal by the Holy Spirit. 

• By work of the Spirit
John 3:5
5 Jesus answered, “Very truly, I tell you, no one can enter the kingdom of God without being born of water and Spirit.
2 Corinthians 3:6
5 Not that we are competent of ourselves to claim anything as coming from us; our competence is from God, 6 who has made us competent to be ministers of a new covenant, not of letter but of spirit; for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life.

• By declaring with your mouth
Luke 12:8
8 “And I tell you, everyone who acknowledges me before others, the Son of Man also will acknowledge before the angels of God; 
Romans 10:9
9 because[b] if you confess with your lips that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. 

• By coming to knowledge of the truth
1 Timothy 2:4
3 This is right and is acceptable in the sight of God our Savior, 4 who desires everyone to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. 
Hebrews 10:26
26 For if we willfully persist in sin after having received the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, 27 but a fearful prospect of judgment, and a fury of fire that will consume the adversaries. 

• By works
Romans 2:6,7
 6 For he will repay according to each one’s deeds: 7 to those who by patiently doing good seek for glory and honor and immortality, he will give eternal life; 
James 2:24
24 You see that a person is justified by works and not by faith alone. 

• By grace
Acts 15:11
11 On the contrary, we believe that we will be saved through the grace of the Lord Jesus, just as they will.”
Ephesians 2:8
8 For by grace you have been saved through faith, and this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God—

• By his blood
Romans 5:9
9 Much more surely then, now that we have been justified by his blood, will we be saved through him from the wrath of God.[
Hebrews 9:22
22 Indeed, under the law almost everything is purified with blood, and without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins.

• By his righteousness
Romans 5:17
17 If, because of the one man’s trespass, death exercised dominion through that one, much more surely will those who receive the abundance of grace and the free gift of righteousness exercise dominion in life through the one man, Jesus Christ.
2 Peter 1:1
To those who have received a faith as precious as ours through the righteousness of our God and Savior Jesus Christ:[c]

• By his Cross
Ephesians 2:16
16 and might reconcile both groups to God in one body[c] through the cross, thus putting to death that hostility through it.[d
Colossians 2:14
14 erasing the record that stood against us with its legal demands. He set this aside, nailing it to the cross. 

Father Mike Schmitz keeps it simple in this short video. 

https://youtu.be/TT4JAxfhgcQ

He asks the question...

Good people go to heaven when they die, right? 
Well according to the Gospels,  not exactly.  

Fr Schmitz points to at least 4 things Christ says we need for salvation.  

1. Baptism (John 3)

2. The Eucharist  (John 6)

3. Faith  (Romans 10:9)

4. Doing the Father's will (Matthew 25:31-46)

There you have it. That all comes straight from the Gospels.  It's true because Jesus Christ says it's true.  Not something like this fairy tale that you give your readers.
Nowhere,  as you have stated in the past,  do the Gospels say to, "be a good person" and its probably better that way because everyone has a different idea of what is good. If Jesus Christ will be judging us, what criteria will He use? But what is His definition of good? Where is that in the Gospel?

Christ has given us everything we need to achieve salvation.  His life and His teachings are well documented. When we do His will, we are being good.  Being a good person comes as a result of our love for God. This is all about His Love for us, and our love for Him. When we love Him, we do all that He commanded through His teaching in the Gospels. It starts with believing in Him. How do you  love someone if we don't believe in them?

Get to know Him! Not by your standards,  but by those of His Holy Church as professed in the Bible!  

Answering an Atheist: Part 8 of 9

 

Mike said the following...


Point is, if someone pretends to have an idea about timing, you should be suspicious. What we do know for sure is that nothing has happened for two thousand years. So if you tell me Jesus is "coming soon," first thing I'm gonna ask is what do you mean by "soon?"

Of course we should be suspicious if someone tells you that they now when He will return. The main theme that runs throughout the Bible has always been that only the Father in heaven knows and that we should be prepared and live our lives as though He will return any minute. One article suggests that Jesus is patiently waiting to come back, because He is giving humanity as much time as possible to choose and follow Him. Jesus wants as many people as possible to repent and return to heaven with Him.

2 Peter 3:8-9 says, 
8 But do not ignore this one fact, beloved, that with the Lord one day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like one day. 9 The Lord is not slow about his promise, as some think of slowness, but is patient with you,[a] not wanting any to perish, but all to come to repentance.

Peter is talking about people like you, Mike. People who have denied Him all of their adult lives. He's being patient hopeful that you'll see the light and come back to Him. All it takes is yours repentance.  All you have to do is ask for forgiveness from the many times that you have denied Him.  A two thousand year wait doesn't take away from the fact that Jesus Christ is God. Its Him being patient with you. He is your Lord and Savior. He is merciful and will take you back right up till the end. Matthew 20:1-16 tells you that. 

20 “For the kingdom of heaven is like a landowner who went out early in the morning to hire laborers for his vineyard. 2 After agreeing with the laborers for the usual daily wage,[a] he sent them into his vineyard. 3 When he went out about nine o’clock, he saw others standing idle in the marketplace; 4 and he said to them, ‘You also go into the vineyard, and I will pay you whatever is right.’ So they went. 5 When he went out again about noon and about three o’clock, he did the same. 6 And about five o’clock he went out and found others standing around; and he said to them, ‘Why are you standing here idle all day?’ 7 They said to him, ‘Because no one has hired us.’ He said to them, ‘You also go into the vineyard.’  8 When evening came, the owner of the vineyard said to his manager, ‘Call the laborers and give them their pay, beginning with the last and then going to the first.’  9 When those hired about five o’clock came, each of them received the usual daily wage.[b] 10 Now when the first came, they thought they would receive more; but each of them also received the usual daily wage.[c] 11 And when they received it, they grumbled against the landowner, 12 saying, ‘These last worked only one hour, and you have made them equal to us who have borne the burden of the day and the scorching heat.’  13 But he replied to one of them, ‘Friend, I am doing you no wrong; did you not agree with me for the usual daily wage?[d] 14 Take what belongs to you and go; I choose to give to this last the same as I give to you. 15 Am I not allowed to do what I choose with what belongs to me? Or are you envious because I am generous?’[e] 16 So the last will be first

All you have to do is repent from your past sins and ask for forgiveness. There are many good priests in Pittsburg who could help you with that. I would think that you could still get your marriage blessed by the church. There are lots of people including your family who are praying that you do.